|
|
Posted by dorayme on 02/03/07 21:07
In article <bef49$45c4ab13$40cba7ad$8529@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> fuli open wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 11:33 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <1170472787.952166.23...@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> >> "fuli open" <fulio...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > I got 11 errors with the 4.01 Transitional, but 28 errors with 3.2
> > Final. It seems better to put the 4.01 Transitional there for the
> > moment. Thanks a lot for your help and encouraging comments.
>
> No, use 4.01 Strict. Fix the errors don't down grade the doctype.
It is a question of confidence in progressing for the OP. If you
look at the source, there is a lot on the plate to get right. A
lot of things to ditch. A lot of rethinking. That amount of
rethinking can dampen the spirit. Perhaps I was going too far in
mentioning less than transitional <g>
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|