|
Posted by Thad on 02/05/07 03:04
Soup it is, but it worked. I created the file in arachnofilia and
everything seemed to work. There is also a validator in arachnofilia which
said "no errors". Sorry that my LACK of programming knowledge showed. What
really hurt was thinking I was doing so well to get it running but with one
unsolveable syntax error...or so I thought. After I posted this first
message, I went to validate the page at WC3 and was shocked at what I saw
was wrong. I want to say thanks for those who took a look at the page and
how embarrased I am on letting the page be seen with so many errors. Back
to the drawing board.
btw, the only error I can dispute was not having the image files on the net.
Not that I didn't want anybody to see them, I just tried to save time by not
uploading them.
Thanks again for all your help.
"Kim Andrι Akerψ" <kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> wrote in message
news:52nj2jF1pebt6U1@mid.individual.net...
> Thad wrote:
>
>> Problem web page: http://www.imagedgifts.com/htmls/makeu5503.html
>>
>> Page seems to look fine but shows error in bottom left hand of screen.
>>
>> Line: 2
>> Char: 1
>> Error: Syntax Error
>> Code: 0
>> url: http://www.imagedgifts.com/htmls/makeu5503.html
>>
>> Can anybody see what might be causing that error?
>
> I don't see that particular error message on that page in either IE7,
> FF2 or Opera9.
>
> Still:
>
> - Your HTML is invalid, defining it as both XHTML 1.0 Frameset to
> begin with, and attemtping to redefine it as HTML 4.01 Transitional
> with a second <head> section inside the <body> tag (which is WAY off)
> - Your page triggers the popup-blocker in all three browsers above
> - The external Javascripts referenced in the header don't exist
> - The images attempted loaded from the select list don't exist
> - Some <a> tags point their target to a frame named "_new", but I don't
> see any frames around in your document by that name
>
> There are also several other errors, but I simply won't let my head get
> through that until you've fixed all the above errors (especially the
> first one; producing a page with at least somewhat-valid HTML and a
> consistent DOCTYPE), since that bit in particular is giving me a
> headache (in a somewhat less manner than as administered by a Microsoft
> Word/Publisher/FrontPage-generated tag soup).
>
> --
> Kim Andrι Akerψ
> - kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com
> (remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|