|
|
Posted by John on 02/08/07 15:47
"STILL LEARNING" <byte.this@usa.net> wrote in message
news:1170947960.533878.199830@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> Kevin, thank you for this solution, very nice. The only drawback I
> can see here is if someone (inadvertently or deliberately, go figure)
> turned OFF their Java, this wouldn't work. I think you can agree,
> it's best to keep this solution as cross-browser + HTML _durable_ (and
> simple) as we can make it.
>
> Otherwise, a very nice solution.
So if you don't want a JavaScript solution, why did you post to
c.a.javascript?
And BTW, Java is not the same as JavaScript, despite the shared letters.
--
John
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|