|
Posted by Eric Lindsay on 02/16/07 13:11
In article <0001HW.C1FA5A300009C20FB022094F@news.supernews.com>,
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@mac.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:22:38 -0600, Jonathan N. Little wrote
> (in article <16e7a$45d4dd14$40cba7b7$14504@NAXS.COM>):
>
> [commenting on the Freeway website]
>
> > Give them credit that unlike MS they actually use their software to built
> > their site! That said, neither impressed with the output of their site nor
> > their gallery of sites. Agree with Andy here....
>
> Incidentally, the W3C Markup Validation Service found 0 errors with the
> Freeway site but 19 with the Adobe site. Oops, I forgot, validation is
> apparently useless. But isn't it adherence to standards that should bring
> about uniformity in presentation of a website amongst all browsers?
Why should I see the site the same on my 20 inch iMac as on my small
display, colour restricted PDA or cell phone? That is what all the web
site tools I've seen so far fail to handle. Maybe because it turns out
to be a really hard problem.
--
http://www.ericlindsay.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|