|
|
Posted by Calum on 02/16/07 22:22
TaliesinSoft wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:13:02 -0600, Calum wrote (in article
> <er538b$m6v$2@reader01.news.esat.net>):
>
>> TaliesinSoft wrote:
>>
>>> As to why Adobe chose to not use Dreamweaver, that would be interesting
>>> to know.
>> Probably because their website has been around for a lot longer than
>> they've owned Macromedia, and there wouldn't be much point in changing
>> over just for the hell of it.
>
> So then, why didn't Adobe use their own GoLive which has been part of the
> Adobe arsenal for quite a few years now, Adobe purchasing it in 1999.
Same reason, probably. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|