Posted by Ed Mullen on 02/17/07 00:48

TaliesinSoft wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:13:02 -0600, Calum wrote (in article
> <er538b$m6v$2@reader01.news.esat.net>):
>
>> TaliesinSoft wrote:
>>
>>> As to why Adobe chose to not use Dreamweaver, that would be interesting
>>> to know.
>> Probably because their website has been around for a lot longer than
>> they've owned Macromedia, and there wouldn't be much point in changing
>> over just for the hell of it.
>
> So then, why didn't Adobe use their own GoLive which has been part of the
> Adobe arsenal for quite a few years now, Adobe purchasing it in 1999.
>

I don't know but I can guess: They outsourced the dev of their web
site, specifying only functional specs, not tools used to accomplish the
feat. What a company builds and sells isn't intrinsic in every facet of
the company's operations. Nor should it be.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue ...

• Next in forum: Re: What's wrong with this HTML (fails validation) ?
• Prev in forum: Re: cleaning up classes and ids in large site
• Thread view: Re: Web Design: Would you design a PDF by writing Postscript in Notepad?

[Reply to this message]