|
|
Posted by dorayme on 02/17/07 01:06
In article <0001HW.C1FBA8CB00458EB8B022094F@news.supernews.com>,
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@mac.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:04:08 -0600, dorayme wrote (in article
> <doraymeRidThis-26D5D5.11040817022007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>):
>
> > In article <0001HW.C1FB86DE003D9B46B022094F@news.supernews.com>,
> > TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I actually considered having the width be flexible, as in your "Better
> >> Way" example, but rejected it. Why I can't exactly remember at the
> >> moment, but when the brain cells bounce properly I'll post the reason.
> >
> > Let me jog your memory. It was because I told you to do it ages ago and no
> > one ever does a single thing I say. It is written in between the atoms, it
> > will be in the next version of Quantum Theory.
>
> Methinks the brain cells have bounced a bit and I think that the reason I
> rejected the fluid arrangement of miniatures on the opening page was the
> inability to return from an excursion to the enlargements with the relevant
> miniature being at the top of the page.
Well, how does it do it with your setup? In Safari, for example,
back buttoning goes back to the page as it was when you left it,
part scrolled. Same with fluid set up I think.
But to be sure, easy problem to overcome. You id the thumbs or
nearby stuff and you "#anchor" refer to it in a link in the
enlargement html page back button:
<a href="medium-04-4.html#medium-04-4">back</a>
and in the thumbnail page in the relevant div you can add a
corresponding id. If you were to use JL's code, would add an id
to his <div class="pixbox" id="medium-04-4"> or something like
that.
Or if you are more comfortable with the name="medium-04-4"
construction, do that...
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|