|
|
Posted by Eric Lindsay on 02/17/07 08:03
In article <0001HW.C1FB2C9D002873E9B022094F@news.supernews.com>,
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@mac.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:04:48 -0600, Eric Lindsay wrote (in article
> <NOwebmasterSPAM-2D3A82.23044816022007@freenews.iinet.net.au>):
>
> > Unacceptable product. Web site uses transitional HTML instead of Strict.
> > Uses tables for layout of a non-table text. Getting the code to validate
> > is one thing. Getting it to be acceptable is another. Can you point me to
> > any page done with Freeway that doesn't have these problems?
>
> Here is the result of validation of a Freeway Pro produced website.....
>
> This Page Is Valid HTML 4.01 Strict!
Well, that was a lot better (I seem to recall that site being discussed
previously).
> In Freeway Pro one can choose whether the generated code will conform to
> transitional or strict.
Thanks for mentioning that. It certainly lifts Freeway a measure in my
estimation.
> The website can be found at
>
> <http://homepage.mac.com/taliesinsoft/Adams/>
Alas, it is still a fixed pixel site. If I were to view it on my cell
phone, I would have a lot of horizontal scrolling to do. I would be
more impressed if it did change width.
http://site.sheltersrus.com.au/galleryall.html
Not a good example, as it may need a page refresh, and the script that
produces it is ... incomplete (also it includes way too many photos and
thus takes too long to load). Change the width of your browser window
and see what happens.
--
http://www.ericlindsay.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|