|
|
Posted by dorayme on 02/19/07 21:44
In article
<1171888043.047811.312710@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote:
> On 17 Feb, 00:47, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > The special case of a need to check
> > every id and class is far fetched but interesting.
>
> I work on large projects with large teams. We use Agile techniques and
> also practice "shared code ownership". This means that one is usually
> working on other peoples' code (actually it means that there isn't any
> "other people's code"!). Additionally there's a competency-specific
> split between the work people do (Java people do Java, JSP people do
> JSP etc.). As my own job is rather centralised and de-specialised, I'm
> often trying to integrate these separate efforts.
>
> Part of this work involves a lot of code analysis. I want to see just
> what has been going on: if particular sections are using inlined
> styles rather than stylesheets, how deep the <table> nesting gets and
> if anyone's still using their remaining hand to type <font> tags.
> Reporting on use of class or id values, and whether these appear to
> correlate between HTML and CSS, is just another part.
Yeah ok. Stop!
I feel as if I am a wretched White tied to a stake, your whole
team of Red Indians dancing around me, making those wa wa wa
sounds, the drums beating, a big pot (big enough to fit me in)
boiling away nearby and you are the gleeful chief in more
magnificent head feathers than the braves...
I was just kinda saying, I mean ... shucks... that perhaps the OP
(remember him?) would be happy with something as simple as ABC...
(Actually, I am still reeling from reading your essay on European
philosophy and web wsiwig technology and have the feeling you are
in a violent and very hungry mood and will be unstoppably boiling
things alive)
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|