|
|
Posted by Erwin Moller on 02/20/07 12:01
Arjen wrote:
> Captain Paralytic schreef:
>> On 20 Feb, 09:29, Arjen <d...@mail.me> wrote:
>>> Just because you can store images in a db doesn't make it a good idea.
>> That is true, but it happens to be a good idea anyway!
>
> Why .. in what situation would bad performance be a good idea ?
Never of course. Unless it gives some other benefit, like ease of migration.
But when you migrate having a database is a little less headache, because
you don't have to worry about the new path, permissions, etc.
(I also never store files (images, documents) in a database, but just the
reference/filename.)
Regards,
Erwin Moller
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|