|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 02/23/07 05:59
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:22:20 -0600, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
wrote:
>| So with the new indexing ability of my new Backwater site a question
>| keeps coming up in my mind...is there a better way?
>yes, there is. anyway other than the way you do it. you inevitably get it
>wrong...pick your context.
Oh boy, I think I've got another Hatter Addict in the making here...or
are you already a Hatter Addict? It's getting hard to keep track,
what with how many of them I have these days.
>| On the Backwater site for example when you click on a nav button it's
>| essentially performing a meta-refresh on the page but then adding on
>| the appropriate GET variable to the URL.
>|
>| This is a bit annoying in that it winds up having to reload about 800K
>| of data, which, even from the browser cache takes 3 to 5 seconds.
>| Now, it is true that in that respect it winds up functioning like your
>| average HTML/CSS/javascript based site...but part of wanting to use
>| Flash (aside from the compatibility) is the increased speed in NOT
>| having to needlessly reload anything from the cache.
>this is web programming 101, dumbass.
Well, no, actually it isn't. What I'm asking for is something that
would essentially go against the very nature of the way it's supposed
to operate and there might not even BE a way of doing it...and if
there is it'd likely fall under "web malware 101" as it would
certainly help that kind out.
>as for 'compatibility', you don't seem
>to conceive that not all browsers support flash...
The only browser that doesn't support Flash is Lynx...which is what
blind people use...and coincidentally it's only in use by like .00001%
of the total net.populous...not that it really matters since the site
has a plain text fall back version in the event that for some idiot
reason the dumbfuck has got Flash disables or in the event that
they're a blind user...or an Amish of the Internet user (a person who
isn't blind who uses Lynx).
>much less javascript or
>css.
....tell me, what the fuck decade are you trapped in, Sunshine? Yeesh,
talk about the technologically stunted. Where the fuck has your
stupid has been for the past 7 years?
>further, you never heed anyone's professional advice that you should be
>accounting for this. but hell, you site is for you...no one else gives a
>flying fuck.
Well the quarter MILLION people going to my site on a monthly basis
seem to disagree with your ASSumptions, you stupid jackass. Speaking
of which, for some reason I'm real popular in Puerto Rico lately, my
Alexia ratings show me at 15,280...which is like...woah... I figured
they musta mentioned one of my sites on one of their television
stations or something. I'm really worried that one of these days
something like that is gonna happen in the US. One lil blurb about my
sites on say Tech TV would be enough to hammer my server with enough
traffic to knock it out of face of existence. If worse comes to worse
I might wind up having to use adsense banners, especially if the
current growth trend on Backwater continues.
>| So the question is...is there some way to make it so that when someone
>| goes to bookmark the page it'll alter the bookmarking URL or is there
>| some way of dynamically altering the URL while NOT actually reloading
>| the page?
>oh, i'd say mind-reading would be good...that, or load all your data in your
>crap-app...errr...i mean, flash-app and then the universe is in the client
>world.
....yup, I was right about you, a Hatter Addict. Free cl00, Kiddo,
this ain't Star Trek and everyone can tell when you're babbling
nonsense.
>if you've ever heard of *security*, you'd know that altering a url
>cannot be a function that is reliably done client-side...even for a good
>hacker.
....why the fuck would a hacker want to alter bookmark URLs you
dribbling dumbfuck? Do you even know what hacking is? Don't answer
that, it's rhetorical.
>further, that altering a url does shit for you unless you access
>what is on the other side of it.
....uh, hello, fucking retard, what part of GET VARIABLES did you not
comprehend the first time I said it? It can alter the url and go to
the appropriate section, it doesn't need to ACTUALLY go to the URL
since it's technically ALREADY FUCKING THERE...yeesh...where the fuck
did this n00b come from?
>finally, you sure put a lot of faith in
>people enabling javascript...because surely you don't plan on manipulating
>it on the server-side.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
Jan 2006 - 10% of users have javascript disabled
Jul 2006 - 8% of users have javascript disabled
Jan 2007 - 6% of users have javascript disabled
Noticing a trend here, Retard? Eventually even the technologically
retarded get forced to catch up with the rest of us. And again, the
site has a plain text fall back version regardless, so your whining is
very much a moot point.
>it is painfully obvious that you failed to architect any of these factors
>into your site...
It is painfully obvious that you're Jesus molesting retarded for not
having noticed that the site has a plain text fall back version built
ESPECIALLY for retards like yourself. ^_^
>| So far the only viable solution I've come up with is to
>| include my own little bookmarking button that when clicked would be
>| able to set a dynamic bookmark...but I was kinda hoping for something
>| a bit more...evolved.
>i suppose one is limited to their own level of evolution in thought
>capacity. hence, you are stuck with these problems.
Hey uh, Retard...I couldn't help but notice that you weren't actually
able to offer...well, ANYTHING in the way of viable solution to the
problem I've presented...well unless you count retarding back HTML
2.0, but since the site already has a fall back version the needs of
your kind has already been met and, well, quite frankly this topic
really doesn't have anything to do with you at all, Dribbles.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."
"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."
"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|