Posted by eavery on 02/27/07 18:07

Yep - that's exactly what I ended up doing....shame to have to add an
extra column (overhead) to the table to do something which should be
so straightforward.
Thanks for your time!

• Next in forum: millions records archiving and delete
• Prev in forum: Re: newbe question: need a way to read in large query with .net
• Thread view: Re: Partition Scheme using a function

[Reply to this message]