|
|
Posted by patrick j on 03/05/07 07:52
On Mar 4, 2007 dorayme wrote:
> We had a thread a while back in which Spider Monkey gave some
> impressive results of personal trials using encoding etc and no
> one really challenged the fact that various masking techniques
> were quite effective in practice.
Yes, I recall that thread. Was it Spider Monkey however who did the tests?
> I believe now in encoding email addresses and my view is that
> spam bots will go for the low lying fruit and that it is worth it
> to put email addresses onto higher branches.
I've gone through the various suggestions and now I think I'll use the
suggested javascript.
Although it's true it doesn't work if javascript is off, I think for this
web-page 99% of users will have javascript on.
The web form I think is the most secure way to prevent the email address
being harvested however the neatness of just the email address on the
web-page is nice in this application.
For some reason I think the javascript might be more secure than using
ASCII number alternative to the actual letters but I don't know why I think
that. Indeed the personal testing out of this reported some time ago in
this newsgroup would shed light on this.
Thanks to all for your suggestions :)
--
Patrick
Brighton, UK
If you wish you can email me from web-site.
<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|