|
|
Posted by Paul B on 03/08/07 16:53
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:51:18 -0500, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> wrote:
>Paul B wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:17:34 +1100, dorayme
>> <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <or9vu29ljthft64m2kosb1mjn89ptjnbnr@4ax.com>,
>>> Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:52:19 GMT, Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The new site's pages are all done in plain transitional HTML (with
>>>>> validation errors, of course),
>>>> Why of course ?
>>>> I use transitional HTML and I don't have validation errors.
>>> Sure, it is not a necessary connection and you are the proof that
>>> it is not.
>>
>>
>>> But generally, to make a site from scratch today with transitional either suggests a lack of experience or confidence
>>> or a special rare good reason.
>>
>> My site was made 3 years ago. Self taught and over 6000 pages. It is
>> used a lot by schools etc, which don't always have the latest browser
>> etc. I've no need to have it as strict, php, cms or any other fancy
>> new idea.
>> It works, why break it ?
>> At least my site will carry on working - THAT'S what matters.
>
>It will? How do you know? If you'd had pages with LAYER tags back when,
>and they'd worked just fine in Netscape 4, and you made the same
>comment, you'd have been sorry.
I use what I know will work. Never used layer tags. :p
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|