|
|
Posted by Big Bill on 03/09/07 15:45
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:57:11 +0100, Rik <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> Hmmmz, a CMS is a real time-saver.
>>>> Also, an seo killer, see
>>>> www.kruse.co.uk/content-management-systems.htm
>>>
>>> Depends highly on the CMS in use.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> 11 of the 12 points do not apply to my own brand of CMS on that list,
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> The very first point actually IMHO supports the use of a CMS. "The
>> content
>> that you can manage is the on-page text". That is what CMS means. Content
>> management. Not web page management. Leave web page management (and SEO)
>> to
>> the web designer. Leave the content management to the client.
>
>Hmmmz, while that may be some definition of CMS I do not agree that it
>shouldn't be altered. While most clients trust me enough to set things up
>correctly, some may want to change some things. Close to total managment
>of the site has to be possible. Anything that can be in a HTML document or
>in the URL has be editable.
Yup.
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/internet-marketing-small-business.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|