|
Posted by Russ Rose on 03/10/07 02:03
1. Not really. The TS is easier, but more "modern". If hiring I would give a
slight edge to the TS. Either shows commitment.
2. Probably.
3. Yes.
"AK" <arshad.khan@policyadmin.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1173440649.016004.12680@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering if anyone could help me in choosing a right training
> course.
>
> My company has agreed to send me on a training course for sql server
> administration. However it is up to me to choose the right training
> course available. i have recently took up a job of sql 2000 dba from a
> developer position. i have worked on t-sql for years but from past few
> months i am also manaing the sql 2000 databases. now my company wants
> to send me for comprehensive MCDBA training. However i am bit
> reluctant to accept that as i heard from quiet a few poeple that MCDBA
> is going to be outdated and i should prefer going for MCTS 2005. But i
> am afreaid if i get trained on 2005 would i be able to manage 2000
> databases efficiently. Morever my compnay haven't got any plans of
> migrating to 2005 in near future but eventually will do that i
> believe. I also have following doubts...
>
> 1. Will MCTS hold more weightage than mcdba?
> 2. Would MCTS help in my career more than MCTS
> 3. Is MCTS 2005 training would help me doing my dba job smoothly on
> 2000 databases?
>
> Please help me in making the right decision.
>
> Thanks,
>
> A.
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|