|
|
Posted by Mike Duffy on 03/11/07 02:51
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote in
news:K3AIh.13489$316.8243@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi:
> Scripsit Mike.Duffy:
>
>> It is intended as a WWW-based application.
>
> It was implicit in the lack of a URL demonstrating the idea that it
> was not.
No doubt, a url to demonstrate would have made my query more clear.
But I prefer to make the whole site ready first. Someone else pointed out
that I should test it with IE7 and a few other browsers before publicizing
it. There is a lot of js, some of it much more complicated [*] than the
story generator I spoke about, so probably he is right.
>
> If the form data is actually sent to a server, making this really
> something that works on the WWW, then
My ISP limits me to static web pages. (No ASP/CGI).
For me, info need not go back to the server in order to consider it a WWW
"application", because in general, a program need not require external
input in order to be considered a true "program".
Thank you for your input. Also, your personal web pages gave me a lot to
think about. When mine are ready, I'll drop you an email to return the
favour.
[*] For reasons pointless to go into here, I needed to write javascript
that generates the actual javascript used to create the intended
functionality.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|