|
|
Posted by Joe (GKF) on 03/16/07 00:46
In article <1173970659.606826.238370@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
dingbat@codesmiths.com says...
> On 15 Mar, 14:21, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
>
> > the latter could actually do some harm, if it helps
> > someone to do something he shouldn't be doing.
>
> There is no significant reason at all why the OP _shouldn't_ do this,
> merely reasons why it's not important to. That's a difference.
>
> As the zeitgeist of this ng is clearly "HTML good, XHTML bad", then
> it's puzzling (to say the least) to see one of the respected regulars
> post an apparently "pro-XHTML" post that's semingly at variance with
> history. That was my real reason for posting, not the OP's original
> question.
>
>
I read JKK's post as saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".
--
Advice is cheap, so always give the best. - Alfred Lawson
http://graspages.cjb.cc/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|