|
|
Posted by Joe (GKF) on 03/16/07 00:52
In article <1173960314.914669.105360@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
spamlovermailbox-sicurity@yahoo.com.au says...
> On Mar 15, 10:58 am, Joe (GKF) <joedinm...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > How does JAWS handle framed sites? Is getting to the navigation frame a
> > pain or is it actually better than a regular site?
> > Or somewhere in between?
> Hmmmm, I think like anything web-related (A part from Flah), which to
> any convensional screen reader is still harder access, frames can be
> mayed more accessible to Jaws, they just need to be well named.
So, you're saying that JAWS handles frames ok?
> frames are very out-dated technology and really should be replaced by
> server side processing and frankly, so should form validation,
Of course - I'm not going to USE the bloody things; I just wondered if I
can add "frames don't work well in JAWS" to my list of "why frames
suck". It seems I can't.
>
> > BTW - I like the colours on your test site. Sure it's InYourFace, but I
> > don't agree with those who say the colours clash.
> >
> Cool, thanks, it's for a new project of mine that i'm working on.
> --
> Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
>
>
--
Advice is cheap, so always give the best. - Alfred Lawson
http://graspages.cjb.cc/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|