|
|
Posted by Steve on 03/16/07 13:22
"Rik" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.to945ds6qnv3q9@metallium...
| laverdir <MOVE-RE_ME_laverdir@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
| > screen space saving, to be precise.
| > for me, it's faster to read algorithm
| > workflow.
| >
| > why do you care anyway?
|
| Because I've had to deal with other peoples code enough to get really
| irritated by their illegible practices. But if you can be a 100% sure you
| are the only one dealing with it, be my guest and go ahead.
AMEN !!!
| > are you some kind of coding martha stewart?
|
| Who?
i think it was meant to be a witty remark of sorts...that doesn't really
carry the desired impact.
| > quoting beginners guides to writing 'readable'
| > code didn't help in this case.
|
| Was it a quote yeah? I'd think native speaking writers would have at least
| a better concept of grammar then I do .
or thAn i do. ;^)
| > im writing code for 22 years and don't care
| > how it's writen, i can read it equaly fast.
i doubt to any degree of success - measured by salary, project size/scope,
business niche filled...much less to say 'team' developed projects (which
are a hallmark of all three).
| You can, it's the 'others' we're worried about here.
| And if you can read it equally fast, why the hell would you format it
| differently in development? Seems a waste of time to me. If you can read
| it equally fast why notgive it the layout that most suits you to begin
| with?
plus, how fucking much time does it take to structure your code as you write
it? to me, as an employer, such neglect is a sign that the overall approach
may have equally hap-hazzard attention paid to it as well.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|