|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 03/22/07 15:35
On 22 Mar, 12:48, "akennis" <a_ken...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> and let me know what is good and what stinks.
You've written chapter #2.
Now go back and write chapter #1, which is about how to _first_ mark
your HTML up to reflect the document semantics and to be presentation
free.
If you take such a document and then worry about chapter #2 (How To
Present It), then you should only rarely need to add a <div>. There
ought to be plenty of non-<div> HTML elements in there already,
describing its content structure.
Inventing a bogus paradigm of "<div>-based design" and comparing it to
<table>-based design just shows that you still haven't got it.
Pontificating a piece of bloggage about it is even worse.
And you used the word "paradigm".
On the web.
In a hostname no less.
That's a clueironing offence around these parts.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|