|
|
Posted by dorayme on 03/22/07 21:00
In article
<1174557927.841532.4410@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"Travis Newbury" <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 21, 1:53 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > On Mar 20, 5:10 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > You need to look at context and be sensitive to differences
> > > > between nice but naughty jokes and pure denigration that are
> > > > quite a slur on a sensitive issue for almost the whole of the
> > > > female world.
>
> (I say in a sarcastic voice....) Everyone's a victim... Thicken up the
> skin baby. People make jokes about dick size, and ED which is a
> sensitive issue for men too but we don't whine about it. We laugh and
> move on with our tiny dicks.
You mean like in Unforgiven where a big guy and his stupid young
mate hold a woman and slash her face ruining her life, because
she, in a giggle - "she knew no better" - made a reference to
"his pecker"?
_You_ laugh and move on mate. You understand almost nothing about
this subject, all of your utterances are designed to help you and
like minded from ignoring issues. Your concentration on
platitudes and easy cases will not fool everyone.
>
> > > The female world does not get a free pass from me. Depending on the
> > > circumstance, and delivery, no joke is off limits. I feel our skins
> > > in general have thinned out way too much.
> > You have a million ways to evade my simple lesson to that shark
> > schmuck. This is your latest nonsense. "Depending on the
> > circumstances..." Do you really suppose anyone could disagree
> > with this. Do you suppose that even I would would tut tut at the
> > foulest suggestions towards a woman if she was torturing you for
> > no good reason? I think a turnip would have a better grasp of the
> > issues than you.
>
> I understand the issue just fine, and I have been very specific in my
> answer.
You have been nothing but vague. It is just so naive to suppose
that throwing a few examples saves you. You are vague because you
give no more analysis than I have given. I have no idea what your
judgment is like, but so far you do not exactly fill me with
confidence.
> Calling a random woman on the street fat is not funny.
We have established this already
> Calling a woman in the audience of a comedy show could be funny.
No one has denied this, certainly not me.
> Saying Hilary has fat thighs is hilarious.
I just love the way your mind jumps and isolates. You need to get
a grip on more than thighs: it started with you saying:
> Of course, being a Republican I then take their money anyway, kill
> their cats, rape their dogs, and blame the Clintons for all three...
Amusing, fine.
Someone replying:
> "I did not have sexual relations with that dog" ;-)
Fine again as far as I interpret it.
and then the remark by that schmuck:
> Okay, that covers Hillary...
And then his stupid remarks following my telling him to get a
better grip on himself.
And then you come charging in with every possible vagueness
supposing that someone who sees this as not acceptable at all has
no sense of humour or resilience to mix it up a bit.
Travis, you only have half a clue about these matters. Just keep
voting for idiots who go on to cause the deaths of thousands of
people who in no way are threatening the American people. And
finding various other lowlinesses funny. There is not much I can
do about it from here. I suspect even a visit from Officer Bud
White, in your case, would not help.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|