|
|
Posted by Blinky the Shark on 03/23/07 05:09
Neredbojias wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:37:58 GMT dorayme scribed:
>
>> In article <Xns98FA7A662A892jeremiahneredbojiasc@208.49.80.251>,
>> Neredbojias <invalid@example.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, in spite of my crass comments of the past and "jokes", I do
>>> respect women - more than you might believe.
>>
>> You would be surprised what can be seen about a person, I
>> believed in you enough to bother to send my friend, Officer Bud
>> White around to have a little chat. I saw hope in you, a glimmer
>> of decency that needed nurturing in a direct if slightly brutal
>> manner. It seems to have worked Boji!
>
> Well, at the risk of seeming the fawning toady, I liked some of the things
> you said in defending your position in the previous of the thread. You
> didn't "whiningly posturize", something that both men and women do, but
> women more frequently. A women has (or should have) to support her
> conclusions and opinions just as a aptly as a man. Logic is sexless.
>
>> As for others, I am considering hiring a Japenese whaling crew to
>> turn their attentions for a while to hunting sharks.
>
> Humans are fallible. Even Christ wasn't perfect (-"Father, why hast thou
> forsaken me?") As a matter of fact, it is my considered belief that no
> form of life whatsoever could exist under the auspices of perfection.
I did not fail. I provided a bit of humor about *one* woman (not All Of
Womankind, who dorayme feels a need to inject into this). When the same
thing happens with humor about a male, does dorayme get on its soapbox?
No. Now, who's really sexist? The one who thinks humor about a man is
okay and humor about a woman is not. That's spelled "dorayme".
--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|