|
Posted by Richard Formby on 03/23/07 03:34
Ciaran wrote:
Does anyone know if it's worth it? [compressing HTML] I mean is the time
spent running
the function less then the time it would take to download the longer
html file? Any thoughts on this?
This comes up over at alt.html all the time. I have seen arguments put
forward where compressing a 50K file to 30K is a good thing *but* that 50K
file links to 500K of images. It's the images that cause the trouble.
--
Richard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|