|
|
Posted by cluthz on 03/25/07 13:32
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
news:36dff$46067617$40cba7c5>
> In Firefox while holding the "CTRL" key down press the "+" a couple of
> times and get your answer!
>
> That image and much of your design is absolute pixels places, but the text
> size and spacing (and the font in fact) can vary from browser to browser
> because of rendering methods, different default settings, user preference,
> OS of user, font availability. To be brief, your design plan is the
> problem, Google "liquid layouts" and avoid "position: absolute;" in most
> cases...
>
>
Thanks Jonathan,
So does this mean I have to do a complete re-design? The thing is I have
other similar pages which work fine in both.
It's just this one.
I did before starting this project ask which is the best way to go about it,
but there was so much debate sparked my question was never properly answered
and I was left confused about the best way.
There seemed to be a lot of different opinion about the best way to proceed
and bugs in browsers which made the work significantly more difficult to
maintain.
In the end pixels have been easiest (assuming I can solve this blip) the
designers were happier using pixels of course.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|