|
Posted by Peter on 06/30/05 20:10
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:54:13 +0100, in alt.2600 Mimic
<dev@null.net> quoth:
>Peter wrote:
>
>> On 29 Jun 2005 23:00:49 GMT, in alt.2600 ByteCoder
>> <me@none.com> quoth:
>>
>>
>>>bny <tidepool@suspicious.org> wrote in
>>>news:42C3207C.9020205@suspicious.org:
>>>
>>>
>>>>you may be able to 'hand code' but sine both of your pages look like
>>>>absolute shit, does it matter that they are 'hand coded'?
>>>>
>>>>Cut off your nose to spite your face.
>>>>
>>>>People (in general) don't look at the code that creates a layout/page,
>>>>they look at what their browser renders. If your Frontpage/Dreamweaver
>>>>code renders nice and cleanly, then why give a flying fuck if a
>>>>WYSIWYG editor is used...
>>>>
>>>>-bny
>>>>
>>>
>>>Because especially the people with a slower internet connection also
>>>look at the speed of rendering.
>>
>>
>> There are some handy tools for stripping out redundant
>> 'code'.
>
>You shouldnt need to strip out redundant code ;)
>time is money, time is money ....or so they say :P
LOL. I think that you'd be surprised at how compressed it
becomes. Also, the stuff I used did batches. So I used to
finish up the day, hit batch processing, and start cooking
dinner. Probably done by the time I'd got to the oven.
As to redundant code, well it's not as bad as your
description of 4 pages of it!
--
Peter
Mine is my freedom
you take I'll defy
laugh 'til I'm tired
sing 'til I'm dry
'cos life is a moment
you pass with a sigh
never comes back sure
as yesterday's bye....
<From "In my own time", by Family>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|