|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 03/26/07 05:10
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:48:32 GMT cluthz scribed:
> This is probably a very naive statement :) but when I look at websites
> that have the best adherence to standards, they are always quite basic
> websites that don't look as good as other ones.
No, it isn't naive, but your attraction to certain sites may be subjective.
Furthermore, standards-adhering sites can be just as "neat" as improperly-
marked-up sites but often aren't because the webmasters in question lack
the skills to make them so. Little John and Bergermutt not only gave you
the correct answers, they provided important clues as well. You need to
study and learn something in order to be proficient at it; this doesn't
come magically overnight. I suggest you download the html 4.01 and css 2.1
documentation, read it, and refer to it often as you construct your next,
hopefully better, website.
--
Neredbojias
He who laughs last sounds like an idiot.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|