|
|
Posted by jsamdirect on 03/26/07 16:09
On Mar 25, 10:09 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> "jsamdirect" <supp...@jsamdirect.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1174877741.180905.165430@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> | On Mar 25, 6:38 pm, Geoff Berrow <blthe...@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> | > Message-ID: <1174845114.046990.109...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> from
> | > jsamdirect contained the following:
> | >
> | > >Here is the minimum requirements:
> | >
> | > >1. Must be located in the U.S.A. The Houston Texas area is preferred
> | > >but not required.
> | >
> | > I've got news for you. With the new-fangled Internet thing location no
> | > longer matters. We are all in cyberspace.
> | > --
> | > Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
> | > 001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
> | > 100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
> |
> | I agree, but in the Houston Area we could meet face to face when
> | needed. And being in the U.S.A. allows for protect under the US law
> | for all involved.
>
> web cams are even newer inventions than that internet/web thingy geoff was
> talking about.
>
> btw, there is law outside the usa. in fact, it is quite well developed -
> they don't even torture or use forced confession anymore. further, even in
> the states you still must qualify the contract's venue of applicable law
> should litigation need to ensue. a good lawyer writing a good contract could
> better open your prospective employee base from lil' ol' houston to the
> entire globe. that would get you on par with that internet thingy - global.
>
> ;^)
LOL ... you make a good point. So, I will retract that requirement :)
1. MUST BE ON THE PLANET EARTH :) Unless interstellar treaties between
our planets have been established...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|