|
|
Posted by jsamdirect on 03/26/07 19:18
On Mar 26, 11:41 am, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> "jsamdirect" <supp...@jsamdirect.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1174925361.323295.207670@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> | On Mar 25, 10:09 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> | > "jsamdirect" <supp...@jsamdirect.com> wrote in message
> | >
> | >news:1174877741.180905.165430@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> | > | On Mar 25, 6:38 pm, Geoff Berrow <blthe...@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> | > | > Message-ID: <1174845114.046990.109...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
> from
> | > | > jsamdirect contained the following:
> | > | >
> | > | > >Here is the minimum requirements:
> | > | >
> | > | > >1. Must be located in the U.S.A. The Houston Texas area is
> preferred
> | > | > >but not required.
> | > | >
> | > | > I've got news for you. With the new-fangled Internet thing location
> no
> | > | > longer matters. We are all in cyberspace.
> | > | > --
> | > | > Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
> | > | > 001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
> | > | > 100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
> | > |
> | > | I agree, but in the Houston Area we could meet face to face when
> | > | needed. And being in the U.S.A. allows for protect under the US law
> | > | for all involved.
> | >
> | > web cams are even newer inventions than that internet/web thingy geoff
> was
> | > talking about.
> | >
> | > btw, there is law outside the usa. in fact, it is quite well developed -
> | > they don't even torture or use forced confession anymore. further, even
> in
> | > the states you still must qualify the contract's venue of applicable law
> | > should litigation need to ensue. a good lawyer writing a good contract
> could
> | > better open your prospective employee base from lil' ol' houston to the
> | > entire globe. that would get you on par with that internet thingy -
> global.
> | >
> | > ;^)
> |
> |
> | LOL ... you make a good point. So, I will retract that requirement :)
> |
> | 1. MUST BE ON THE PLANET EARTH :) Unless interstellar treaties between
> | our planets have been established...
>
> you do know we're just giving you a hard time, right? i hope you find the
> 'right' person for your needs. i'm sure your site will soon be a stunning
> marvel and the pride of the whole www.
>
> as for revised requirement 1, aliens needn't be 'on the planet earth', *and*
> regardless of their proximity to our green and blue spherical jewel, *you*
> must abide by the laws of the land. so, a treaty or other benevolent
> relationship would have to be (or have been) established by 'the state' in
> either case. even so, you would still need a good lawyer to draft a contract
> that stated the specific venue of applicable law by which all parties would
> not only abide, but present potential litigation. those laws combined with
> additional, legal, contractual obligations make for a very clear set of
> responsibilities and remedies whether you have flesh or a green gelatenous
> body form (i had to put 'green' in there as some human beings, in
> appearance, can only be distinguished by the color given the aforementioned
> description of said aliens). ;^)
>
> cheers.
Yeah, I know ya'll are just mess with me... never-the-less some good
points :)
P.S. I think my neighbor is an alien.... Maybe he (err it??) will know
of a good lawyer... hehehehe
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|