|
|
Posted by -Lost on 03/30/07 02:09
"-Lost" <missed-spam@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:UI6dnXHucOE87ZHbnZ2dnUVZ_rOqnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message news:mbZOh.532$vJ5.348@newsfe12.lga...
>>
>> "-Lost" <missed-spam@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:obydncE5nPSgwJHbnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> | "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
>> news:KvWOh.43$qe1.9@newsfe04.lga...
>> | >| The code is thus:
>> | >
>> | > the code is this?
>> | >
>> | > ;^)
>> |
>> | http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=thus
>> |
>> | 1 and 5.
>> |
>> | Neener neener neener! : P
>>
>> NO, NO, NO !!!
>>
>> it is the part of speech you're having problems with. 'thus' is an ADVERB,
>> 'this' is a PRONOUN. the word in question is the direct object of a
>> sentence...which we all know must be either a NOUN or, you guessed it, a
>> PRONOUN...
>>
>> 'thus', i am correct...and 'the code is this.'
>>
>> | > | if($_POST)
>> | > | {
>> | > | foreach($_POST as $index => $value)
>> | > | {
>> | > | print $index . ' : ' . $value . '<br />' . "\n";
>> | > | }
>> | > | }
>> | >
>> | > how about this instead? ;^)
>> | >
>> | > print_r($_POST)
>> |
>> | Sure. Dumped it that way initially. Still no change.
>>
>> ok...just k.i.s.s for me. ;^)
>
> K.I.S.S.'d just for you.
>
> http://foomanchu.com/test_for_js_server-side.htm is the form (with metas).
> http://foomanchu.com/test_for_js_server-side.php has *THIS* code:
>
> <?php
> print_r($_POST);
> ?>
> <br />
> <a href="test_for_js_server-side.htm">back</a>
>
> ...and that is *everything.*
>
>> | > | That is it.
>> | > |
>> | > | At one point I did however set a Cache-Control and Expires header in
>> the
>> | > script first.
>> | >
>> | > however, no, that is not it. the code that generates the html with the
>> form
>> | > that is doing the posting.
>> | >
>> | > | > from your description, the problem is with your code...not your
>> browser.
>> | > |
>> | > | See above.
>> | >
>> | > see above.
>> |
>> | OK, if I understood that correctly, I need to set the headers via the meta
>> tag in my HTML
>> | not in the PHP at all?
>>
>> just show me the code (if there is any) that produces the html from which
>> your form is defined and submitted. right now, based on your description, i
>> think the problem is with your code and NOT with caching. so, let's start
>> simply first. we'll go on from there.
>
> See above. : )
>
>> | Thanks for bearing this with patience (until I catch up).
>>
>> no biggie. ;^)
>>
>> | NOTE!: Um... I just noticed it is not doing it anymore! The only thing I
>> have done is
>> | update:
>> |
>> | Firefox from 1.5.0.10 to 1.5.0.11
>> | NoScript extension to the latest version.
>> |
>> | (No, I refuse to upgrade to Firefox 2.x. (Yet.))
>> |
>> | Now I am really confused. Everything is now working as if setting the
>> headers via meta in
>> | my HTML worked. (And for the record I do not set anymore cache headers
>> via PHP. I am
>> | just print_r'ing $_POST.)
>>
>> are you sure that was all that was changed? if so, please post all the
>> details for my future reference (in case i or someone else has the problem
>> again).
>
> In the exact order:
>
> The last update was to the HTML (form page). I added:
>
> <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT" />
> <meta http-equiv="pragma-directive" content="no-cache" />
>
> Nothing else. I continued refreshing and playing with it.
>
> Turn JavaScript on, submit, get true.
> Turn JavaScript off, submit, sometimes get true again.
> Refresh a thousand times (with JavaScript off) and finally get false.
>
> The main problem here was it showing me true, after turning JavaScript back off.
>
> Then: updated Firefox and NoScript (and HTML Validator).
>
> Came back from eating sushi, played with it, and saw that it updated each time.
>
> Turn JavaScript on, submit, get true.
> Turn JavaScript off, submit, get false.
> Repeat.
>
> Hope that was clear enough (because I still don't know what cleared it up).
>
> Thanks again.
And lastly (just now) I changed the pragma-directive to pragma. Don't know what the heck
I was thinking there (but I guess it is obvious the meta pragma didn't do it).
That line again is:
<meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
-Lost
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|