|
|
Posted by -Lost on 03/30/07 08:11
"Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message news:BC2Ph.5802$Ai4.5801@newsfe06.lga...
>
> "-Lost" <missed-spam@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:haadneq2G8W1ApHbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vnZ2d@comcast.com...
> | "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
> news:VF0Ph.3319$Ai4.2733@newsfe06.lga...
> | >| In the exact order:
> | > |
> | > | The last update was to the HTML (form page). I added:
> | > |
> | > | <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT" />
> | > | <meta http-equiv="pragma-directive" content="no-cache" />
> | > |
> | > | Nothing else. I continued refreshing and playing with it.
> | > |
> | > | Turn JavaScript on, submit, get true.
> | > | Turn JavaScript off, submit, sometimes get true again.
> | > | Refresh a thousand times (with JavaScript off) and finally get false.
> | > |
> | > | The main problem here was it showing me true, after turning JavaScript
> | > back off.
> | > |
> | > | Then: updated Firefox and NoScript (and HTML Validator).
> | > |
> | > | Came back from eating sushi, played with it, and saw that it updated
> each
> | > time.
> | > |
> | > | Turn JavaScript on, submit, get true.
> | > | Turn JavaScript off, submit, get false.
> | > | Repeat.
> | > |
> | > | Hope that was clear enough (because I still don't know what cleared it
> | > up).
> | > |
> | > | Thanks again.
> | >
> | > no problem. try this as your html. i used ie and my results were:
> | >
> | > array()
> | > back
> |
> | Which is exactly what I received from Firefox.
> |
> | > anyway, try this just for grins and giggles (note the removal of the xml
> tag
> | > and placement of the js):
> | >
> | > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> | > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
> | > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
> | > <head>
> | > <title></title>
> | > <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8;" />
> | > <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT" />
> | > <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
> | > </head>
> | > <body>
> | > <form id="form1" action="test_for_js_server-side.php" method="post">
> | > <p id="form-p1">
> | > <input type="hidden" name="javascript_enabled" value="false" />
> | > <input type="text" name="text1" value="text 1" />
> | > <input type="text" name="text2" value="text 2" />
> | > <input type="text" name="text3" value="text 3" />
> | > <input type="submit" value="Submit" />
> | > </p>
> | > </form>
> | > </body>
> | > </html>
> | > <script type="text/javascript">
> | > form1.javascript_enabled.value = 'true';
> | > </script>
> |
> | Done.
> |
> | However, the result is now always false. We find the culprit by realizing
> you left the
> | id="form1" yet you reference it via the named attribute.
> |
> | <form name="form1" ...>
> | document.forms['form1'].elements['javascript_enabled'].value = 'true';
> |
> | Solves this problem.
> |
> | And, it works as expected. Which, however, is not different from my final
> initial
> | example.
> |
> | So, thank you! I see now, two comparable working documents that both
> provide the
> | end-result that I was hoping for.
> |
> | I still cannot fathom that it was somehow the NoScript extension that
> might have been the
> | cause of my problems. Originally, after turning JavaScript to off, when
> it was on,
> | results in me seeing that it is set to "ON" (true), time and time again.
> |
> | Yet now that I have updated, I see no problems whatsoever, and again, the
> form and
> | server-side is as I wish it.
> |
> | Thanks again!
>
> no problem. man, that's frustrating. i wonder what's causing it.
>
> | P.S. I would like to note at this point, if I have left out some glaring
> omission, that I
> | have imbibed clearly half a 5th of Jose Cuervo Especial. Talk about a
> glutton for
> | punishment, aye? I just want to code, dammit! : )
>
> well, you will probably feel very code-prolific since whatever you write,
> you'll see three of. ;^)
Aye!
> have a good night (that means keeping what goes down from coming back up).
I surely hate to admit it, but um, I had a problem on the very last shot of a 5th.
I will leave the outcome up to your imagination (as I see you are already not far off).
-Lost (hiccup)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|