|
|
Posted by cluthz on 03/30/07 19:43
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote in message
>> The site has been received very well when we test it on people
>
> "No one complained while we stood over them for a few minutes"
>
> with a dash of
>
> "People who hate it simply leave without comment"
>
> I don't believe that you did "test" it, or that your study group was
> in any way representative. No-one does this -- it's too expensive.
> Yes, I have done it. Very rarely, and only in hugely expensive
> usability trials I just can't afford to run very often.
>
>
>> we use it as an example of what can be done and people respond very
>> positively.
>
> or "I am right"
>
>> As for examples of websites that don't look good, well actually it is
>> often
>> the websites to whcih the tutorials are on that actually put me off.
>
> or "You're all wrong"
>
>> I do not want to give any examples as I would not want to offend
>
> or "I have no real evidence to support my prejudices"
>
>> I do accept the example I have given most probably could have been done
>> better.
>
> or "It's complete crap with any variance in font size, for a trivial
> site that could be entirely re-written in a few minutes"
>
>> Fortunletly it works well at the moment
>
> For you. Not for everyone.
Glad you are able to read between the lines ;)
Criticism is good as long as it is not of my work.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|