|
Posted by David Segall on 04/05/07 15:42
Bergamot <bergamot@visi.com> wrote:
>David Segall wrote:
>>
>> Of the four sites they reference only one
>> <http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/1999/10/desi/> attempts "fluid
>> design" and it illustrates why the concept fails. The text is far too
>> wide to read comfortably and the menu at the top of the page is
>> designed exclusively for a 1024 pixel wide monitor.
>
>Which only goes to show that anybody can implement a good design poorly. ;)
OK. But please provide the URL of _any_ site that implements your view
of "good design" well. For the purpose of this discussion "good
design" means a site that looks good to you in a browser window that
ranges in size from 800x600 to 1680x1050 pixels.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|