|
|
Posted by K. on 04/13/07 06:28
Uzytkownik "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> napisal w wiadomosci
news:yTvTh.35223$ve1.26510@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> Scripsit Travis Newbury:
>
>> On Apr 12, 8:02 am, "K." <halinaciern...@poczta.onet.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I created yet unfinished pagewww.slub.zmyslowski.pl about my
>>> wedding.... I used validator before->http://www.htmlvalidator.com/.
>>> -> my page is
>>
>> Man I don't have an answer for you, but I have to give you kudos for
>> doing all the prerequisite work and giving us a URL and validating
>> your page first.
>
> Well, almost giving us a URL (the http:// part is missing) and trying to
> validate. Unfortunately, he used a product that is dishonestly sold as a
> validator but isn't, the infamous "CSE HTML Validator". His confusion is
> understandable; the phoney validator's business isn't.
>
> In reality, the page contains dozens of syntax errors, as a real validator
> like http://validator.w3.org would tell (for free). The page has a mixture
> of XHTML 1.0 and HTML 4.01 syntax, and contrary to the doctype
> declaration, it uses Transitional features. It should be fixed to comply
> with HTML 4.01 Transitional, then perhaps improved (by replacing
> presentational markup by CSS) to HTML 4.01 Strict.
>
> The problem asked is independent of these problems. As Els writes in his
> reply, the gaps are caused "by the space that is below text and
> inline-images, to make room for descenders of letters like g,j,p,q,y".
> Setting display: block for the images is one way of fixing. Another
> option, perhaps more natural, is
> img { vertical-align: bottom; }
>
> Technically, the problem is that an image is treated as a special kind of
> text element, like a letter, which is by definition vertically aligned to
> the _baseline_ of text. You can see this if you put an image between
> letters, e.g. <p>yep<img ...>yep</p>.
>
> This is what CSS specifications say, and Firefox obeys this, whereas IE
> doesn't. But this can fixed either by making the images blocks (as far as
> rendering is considered), which aren't treated as text elements, or by
> explicitly setting their vertical alignment to bottom (i.e., the bottom of
> the image is aligned to the bottom of the enclosing element's box).
>
> --
> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR HELP
It fully helped me
Thank you one more time
Marcin
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|