|
|
Posted by Ikke on 04/13/07 16:48
John Hosking <John@DELETE.Hosking.name.INVALID> wrote in
news:461ee8d8$1_2@news.bluewin.ch:
>>>P.S. Please don't do as I've done - a bilingual _page_ is generally
>>>not a good idea, even if a bilingual _site_ might be. I'm just too
>>>lazy to change things now.
>>
>> I don't know why a bilingual site would be a bad idea - for a lot of
>> sites in my country, it is not even and option NOT to be bilingual
>> (since our country is basically bilingual).
>
> Read it again, Ikke. Jukka didn't say a bilingual *site* would be bad;
> he's warning against a bilingual *page*, that is, a page with Dutch on
> the left and its English equivalent on the right, for example.
Jukka wrote "even if a bilingual _site_ might be". I took "might" as "it
might be, but it could also be otherwise". So therefor I asked what the
downside would be.
But you are probably write in stating that I just misunderstood Jukka.
Anyway, I agree that a bilingual page (as you stated, with both languages
on one page) is a bad idea, with the possible exception of some cases.
Thanks,
Ikke
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|