|
|
Posted by dorayme on 04/14/07 23:34
In article <0bednaBi1JCwwbzbRVnyjwA@eclipse.net.uk>,
"mr rudeforth" <mr@dot.spot> wrote:
>
> "Bergamot" <bergamot@visi.com> wrote in message
> news:58d2i9F2g77s2U1@mid.individual.net...
> > Jon Slaughter wrote:
> > > "mr rudeforth" <mr@dot.spot> wrote in message
> > > news:CJSdnTp7nZsNq7zbnZ2dnUVZ8tGqnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk...
> > >>>
> > >> http://browsershots.org/
> > >
> > > Awesome.
> >
> > Not really. It can only give a very general idea of how any particular
> > browser will render a page. It does not tell you how it handles
> > variations in text or window size, what happens with JavaScript (or with
> > it disabled) and a host of other variable browser settings.
> >
> > If you rely only on this service to test your pages, you'll be
> disappointed.
> >
> i rely on it for layoutonly so it is fine.
> oh and it can be configured how you wish in regards to javascript, etc
You are not getting Bergamot's point. Layout is not something
independent of the text size users use.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|