|
|
Posted by Steve on 04/16/07 05:30
"comp.lang.php" <phillip.s.powell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176696259.542761.158820@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| On Apr 15, 11:49 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
| > "comp.lang.php" <phillip.s.pow...@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >
| > news:1176694395.805515.273040@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| > | How does "for all the 'performance' reasons the brain-dead author
| > | gives for creating
| > | this beast" help anyone? Thank you for utterly useless ad-hominem
| > | information!
| >
| > well <as he scratches his head>, it kind of warns you NOT to use the
code,
| > as in solving your current problem will not solve the others you will
have
| > when you employ this class. but i though that was apparent in the
examples i
| > gave to support my opinion.
| >
| > i'm now assuming you are said brain-dead author since you glossed over
the
| > litany of things-gone-wrong in the code that i pointed out and have
| > immediately championed a defensive attitude.
|
| So I assume you feel calling someone "brain-dead" is your way of
| assuming they are receptive to your solutions, whatever they may be,
| which, as I can see, do not yet exist by your means.
you post as 'comp.lang.php' not as PHIL (author of the shitty class).
knowing this know, both of us, does the code change somehow such that it
isn't shitty...enough where i should justifiably refrain from calling it
shitty? having seen that this is NOT PHIL'S code in the first place (thanks
for outting yourself with the link), i can only be MORE correct in the use
of "brain-dead" since you try to pass it off as your own.
BALL FOUR...i can take my base now.
keep racking 'em up, PHIL.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|