|
|
Posted by Jukka K. Korpela on 04/18/07 08:23
Scripsit Luis Farzati:
> Yes, I've uploaded the file to http://200.32.3.194/test/index.html .
That's better, though IP addresses in place of domain names make me
suspicious.
> I've validated markup and CSS.
Fine.
> In fact I've added the W3C validator
> links at the bottom of the page so I can quickly check this with every
> change.
You should install e.g. the Web Developer Extension for Firefox so that you
can easily validate any page and don't need to pollute your pages with such
links.
> The layout I want is a left,
> vertical panel containing user information.
Does the information have to appear in an illegibly small font?
> There will be more things
> at the right of the page but that doesn't matter now. Some rows in
> this left panel may contain two fields (one right to the other) and
> some rows contains just one field.
Have you considered whether it would best be marked up as a table, or a
collection of tables? Looks like tabular information to me.
But what is the problem? You should have told what you don't like in the
visual appearance, instead of telling us to compare it on "both" browsers to
find the difference you have in your mind.
> You are right, the 'pt' unit is a bad practice I'm carrying
So why didn't you stop using it?
> Any thoughts, critics and suggestions about this way of structure the
> information will be greatly appreciated!
But what about the original question? You told there's something wrong but
didn't specify what it was.
On the other hand, creating good markup for the material you actually have
might be the best thing to do first.
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|