|
Posted by Richard Rundle on 04/18/07 18:59
"Albert Wiersch" <donotreply@123donotreply123.com> wrote in message
news:132agj4okmo875a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hRaVh.53663$VU4.13254@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Albert Wiersch wrote:
> >
> >> CSE HTML Validator doesn't claim pages to be "valid". ...
> >
> > Well! Then why do you name it CSE HTML *Validator* ?
>
> Because it finds problems in web pages, which is what people want when
they
> look for a validator.
>
No. What I (at least) want is for a validator to tell me what's valid.
--
Richard
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|