|
|
Posted by Bernhard Sturm on 04/18/07 20:31
Neredbojias wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:24:22 GMT Bernhard Sturm scribed:
>
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:37:40 GMT Bernhard Sturm scribed:
>>>
>>>> Just a question: how big is the minimal TCP/IP packet-size? Do you
>>>> really think it makes a difference if you transport 28 bytes instead
>>>> of 128 bytes? With the former you will just have more overhead,
>>>> that's all. IMHO This is purely an academic issue and not of
>>>> real-world importance.
>>> Years ago I played-around with packet-size at the larger end of the
>>> scale and it made quite a difference on 56k.
>>>
>> so it makes a difference if I am going to send 28bytes in 4kb packets
>> instead of 128bytes in 4kb packets?
>> how is that?
>
> Doubtful, and even putting words in my mouth won't make it so.
>
> Now before you accuse me of obfuscation, re-read the first 2 sentences of
> your above post and see if they make you dizzy this time.
>
sorry.. I am confused. What did I put in your mouth? I was just asking a
question as you seemed to have experimented with packet-size. No
intention of accusing you of anything. I thought you could share those
results with us.
cheers
bernhard
--
www.daszeichen.ch
remove nixspam to reply
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|