|
|
Posted by Sherm Pendley on 04/21/07 00:10
Neo Geshel <gotcha@geshel.org> writes:
> Sherm Pendley wrote:
>> Neo Geshel <gotcha@geshel.org> writes:
>>
>>> NOTE: PAST EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN ME THAT MANY ON USENET FAIL TO READ
>>> ARTICLES PROPERLY PRIOR TO ANSWERING. I AM LOOKING FOR VERY SPECIFIC
>>> INFORMATION, THEREFORE PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THOROUGHLY BEFORE
>>> RESPONDING; OR ASK QUESTIONS TO CLARIFY. I *WILL* APPRECIATE ANY
>>> CONSTRUCTIVE REPLY.
>>
>> You begin by cross-posting, shouting, and then telling us that we should
>> read an article "properly", even though you can't be bothered to post it
>> that way.
>
> Would you rather I multi-post?
No, I would rather you choose one group. This doesn't belong in .misc, or
in .site-design, and alt.html is well-nigh useless.
>> My advice is, since using XHTML is causing problems, use HTML instead.
>> Problem solved.
>
> I have far more problems with HTML and “quirks mode” rendering
> differences between browsers
This is getting to be a common theme for you, complaining about problems
you've created for yourself. If quirks mode causes problems, use a DTD
that doesn't trigger it. Problem solved.
>> don't come back here asking for solutions to the problems you've insisted
>> on creating for yourself, and insulting the very people who tried to tell
>> you how to avoid those problems in the first place.
>
> Confusing cause and effect, are we?
No, "we" aren't. You seriously think you're the first person to try this?
Do you think that the advice given to everyone else who has tried it will
be any different for you?
Get over yourself and type "XHTML" into a Google Groups search. Then read
and learn.
sherm--
--
Web Hosting by West Virginians, for West Virginians: http://wv-www.net
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|