|
|
Posted by Bergamot on 04/22/07 17:00
Desmond wrote:
> On 22 Apr, 09:44, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
>> Scripsit Desmond:
>>
>> But you actually
>> need to read it and to comprehend it; fullquoting it doesn't help.
>
> I do understand fully
No, you don't seem to get the part about full quoting. At least you're
not top-posting. :-\
Trim your posts so only the parts you're responding to remain.
> <td>This isn't working</td> so the Apostraphy is causing an error.
> This is perfectly acceptable in HTML but tell that to w3c
No, what you have written there is perfectly valid. That's either *not*
what's on the actual page, or you are omitting information that would
tell us the whole story.
If you're using that curly "smart" quote character that word processors
usually insert, that is not the same as the single 'tick' character and
is invalid except with encodings like Windows-1252, or if you use entity
’ instead. Mr Korpela already told you this.
Actually, it is entirely possible that the quote characters are not the
problem at all. A validation error in one place can easily result in
errors elsewhere that don't really exist. Fix the *real* error, and the
others disappear.
Post a URL if you expect to get an answer that isn't purely speculative.
--
Berg
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|