|
|
Posted by Jim S on 04/24/07 14:53
> Your site is just one frame wrapper for your "virtual domain". There are
> a plethora of very affordable hosting companies out there with real
> domain name + hosting package...not frames required
>
You see I already don't understand what you are saying :o(
I know I can have the whole site hosted, but I don't understand how that
solves the frames problem when I use the frame to get from a movable
thumbnail strip to final picture without losing the thumbnails or opening a
new window.
>> I guess I shall just stick with the 'if it works, don't fix it' mantra.
>
> Well I would say it ain't broke though
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jimscott.co.uk%2F
> Result for http://www.jimscott.co.uk/ - W3C Markup Validator
Well... yes, but my virtual domain ,as you put it
(www.jimscot.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk), validates o.k. 'cept for the frames
problem.
--
Jim S
Tyneside UK
http://www.jimscott.co.uk
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|