Posted by Vince Morgan on 04/24/07 13:44

"Vince Morgan" <vinhar@REMOVEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:462e035a$0$22844$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> <davidkoree@gmail.com> wrote in message

I forgot to offer any real context.

print_r($_SESSION["f5s"]->_status); // -- bad one --
/* This is bad one.
* For example, if user has finished 3 steps, the $_SESSION["f5s"]-
>_status should be:
* { [step_1] => done, [step_2] => done, [step_3] => done }
* But on some client computers the $_SESSION["f5s"]->_status may look
like this:
* { [step_1] => done, [step_3] => done }

At this point the previously saved state of the session data could be
reloaded. The session id would still be the same at this point, so the
correct file to load can easily be idendified.

* or this:
* { }
* If we refresh the browser on or more times, the $_SESSION["f5s"]-
>_status would be complete (or uncomplete).

If after reresh, and data is missing, samo. I'm not sure that JS would be
required for this, though I beleive it would.
Vince

• Next in forum: Re: Reducing memory consumption
• Prev in forum: Re: mssql_connect() Problems
• Thread view: Re: why a session-based program behaves different on different computers

[Reply to this message]