|
|
Posted by dorayme on 04/27/07 03:37
In article <slrnf3283d.5hq.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
> On 2007-04-26, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> [...]
> > The distinction that I was pointing out would then be applied to
> > within the class of bugs. At least the ones that do follow a
> > known logic can be dealt with if enough effort is assigned. Those
> > that do not follow a known logic can be split into a further two
> > types. One, those that do follow a logic but not a known one.
> > Two, those that don't follow a logic that can ever be learned in
> > an individual case.
>
> Do you mean logic in the sense of something that the manifestation of
> the bug follows? In other words, something related to reproducibility?
Yes, that will do fine, reproducibility.
My speculation was also that there could be some surprising and
unwanted effects that are not in this class because they fall
under some part of chaotic events in the partly understood
technical sense that is discussed under Chaos Theory.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|