|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 04/29/07 23:12
Jon Slaughter wrote:
>> Maybe if you would have explained it this way in the start you would have
>> gotten better answers. This is NOT the problem you started with!
>>
>
> It is exactly the problem I started with. I might have not explained as well
> but that is entirely different.
>
>> As it is, I can think of a couple of ways to do it. But after seeing the
>> way you treat people trying to help you, I'm not inclined to post them.
>>
>
> Well, its your choice. I might have overreacted and then that was my fault.
> Now that I look at my original post I can see how it doesn't explain it that
> well. I thought it was clear at the time.. in any case you just have to look
> at the line
>
> "Is there any command that essentially executes the code and then echo's
> it?"
>
> you know, Janwillem had no problem with it and he was the first to post. So
> it can't be all that unclear.
>
> I just don't like people trying to dictate to me how I'm suppose to think or
> what I am thinking about.
>
> "The answer was correct. It's the question we are having a problem with"
>
> Thats just total BS. Now maybe I did overreact. If so then I apologize.
> But when I read that I read that Geoff is telling me that my question is
> wrong. I'll be damned if questions are wrong. Questions are not
> propositions. He could have just said "Hey, I don't understand what your
> exactly trying to do." instead of trying to make seem like I'm wrong and
> he's right kinda crap. Its not about who's smarter or who's wrong or right
> but about solving the problem.
>
>
> In any case. Whether it was clear or not is unimportant at this point.
> Janwillem got it from the start and even if my post was completely unclear
> then someone should have been asking "Why would Janwillem say that instead
> of what Toby said"?.
>
> Hell, maybe I did overreact but statements like
>
> "The answer was correct. It's the question we are having a problem with"
>
> just piss me off to no end ;/ Its like someone trying to tell me that wrong
> answers are right because its the question thats wrong. If I did that in a
> class on a test and then after the test went up to him and said "no, the
> answer is 1. Your question: "1+1="? is wrong because it should have been
> "1+0="". You think he would say "Hey, thats great; Your right!! You get an
> A+"? Even in a philosophy class that wouldn't work... even more so.
> Wouldn't work in a business either. Its just wrong and Geoff is trying to
> feed me that BS.
>
> Jon
>
>
Jon,
Well, get over it. He answered the question you asked. Then you told
him it wasn't the answer you wanted.
You asked if "Is there any command that essentially executes the code
and then echo's it?". include() does exactly that.
The fact is, you don't want to just execute and echo the code. Now you
tell us you want to modify results before it's output. That's a
different problem.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|