|
|
Posted by "messju mohr" on 09/30/42 11:20
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:51:28PM +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
> messju mohr wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:30:14AM +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >
> >>anybody care to explain that?
> >
> >
> >someone requested that feature and somebody else implemented it. it's
> >that simple.
(just to clarify: i was in neither of the two parties above)
> well if it's like that then I'm wondering why you/others repeatedly bash
> the 'keep it simple for the developers - and don't given them 'programmatic'
> interfaces/paradigms to work with, they will get confused and f*** it up'
> drum.
are you trolling? it should read "keep it simple for the designers, so
give them *simple* 'programmatic' interfaces/paradigms to work with"
or something like that, i think.
> basically I think you gave a bogus answer, messju. and if you really stand
> by
> it - rather than it being an off-the-cuff retort - then your arguments
> regarding uncoupling/seperating the designer from [complex] code and
> programming-related resposibilities (like making sure no tainted data makes
> it
> into the output) are very weak IMHO, because a feature request, the fact
> that somebody codes
> the feature and whether the implemented feature in included in the codebase
> are 3 seperate
> things but by your logic implementing something equates to including it in
> the codebase.
no. that's your interpretation, not my logic. you are trolling, don't you?
> I.m sure that's all not true but as fas as I am concerned it still leaves
> the fact that stuffing (in this example) REQUEST superglobals into the scope
> compiled templates run in is not right according to your own arguments
> regarding
> accomodating the designer's role inside a work/development-process.
>
> I would argue that Smarty should be blocking access to GET/POST/REQUEST
> (as much as is possible) by default.
>
> what do you think?
I think there are features in smarty that i don't need, so I don't use
them (request vars is one of them, method-calls is another one). And
I think you should act the same.
greetings
messju
> rgds,
> Jochem
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|