|
|
Posted by "messju mohr" on 10/01/63 11:20
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:14:15PM +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
[...]
> >are you trolling? it should read "keep it simple for the designers, so
>
> no I'm not. I use Smarty everyday, I accept it the way it is mostly and
> hack it
> where I can/need (which is not much!). I'm entitled to speak up about the
> whys and wherefores - personally I think indepth discussion about
> theory as well as practice is a good thing, but if you want to start
> waving the troll flag as soon as someone questions [part of] Smarty's
> design/implementation that is your perogative.
Okay, to me you sounded very rude so i thought you just want to rant,
but I'm (quite obviosuly) no native english speaker, so the error is
on my side, sorry.
Just as a note: I think the word you mean is "prerogative", but it's
something i neither have nor want to have.
> >give them *simple* 'programmatic' interfaces/paradigms to work with"
> >or something like that, i think.
[... food for endless discussions optimized...]
To get back on topic:
I agree I with that having $smarty.request is a bad thing. But I'm -1
on removing it for the sake of backwards compatibility.
greetings
messju
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|