|  | Posted by Pedro on 06/13/40 11:20 
Hands Up everyone ?!!
 who would like a switch to  ON/off Globals
 ie whether {$smarty.get.FOO}, $smarty.server.SERVER_NAME} et all are
 exposed as a $smarty->request_use_globals; //true by default
 eg
 $smarty->request_use_globals(false); // disable all Globals
 $smarty->request_use_globals( array('server','get' )) ; // only server+ get
 
 
 to go with
 http://smarty.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.smarty.php
 and
 http://smarty.php.net/manual/en/variable.request.use.auto.globals.php
 (who uses $REQUEST_N? anymore ??
 and
 http://smarty.php.net/manual/en/variable.security.settings.php
 
 just an idea to digest
 
 Jochem Maas wrote:
 > messju mohr wrote:
 >
 >> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:14:15PM +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
 >> [...]
 >>
 >>>> are you trolling? it should read "keep it simple for the designers, so
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> no I'm not. I use Smarty everyday, I accept it the way it is mostly
 >>> and hack it
 >>> where I can/need (which is not much!). I'm entitled to speak up about
 >>> the
 >>> whys and wherefores - personally I think indepth discussion about
 >>> theory as well as practice is a good thing, but if you want to start
 >>> waving the troll flag as soon as someone questions [part of] Smarty's
 >>> design/implementation that is your perogative.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Okay, to me you sounded very rude so i thought you just want to rant,
 >
 >
 > I would like to be part of the discussion that possibly leads to
 > improvements
 > in the next generation of Smarty. - I figure that if I say nothing then
 > its pure chance that things will change to my liking - if I do
 > speak-up/discuss
 > then at least I have done something to state my case :-)
 >
 > that In no way discounts the possibility that I am indeed rude ;-)
 >
 >> but I'm (quite obviosuly) no native english speaker, so the error is
 >> on my side, sorry.
 >
 >
 > no probs.
 >
 >
 >
 >>
 >> Just as a note: I think the word you mean is "prerogative", but it's
 >> something i neither have nor want to have.
 >
 >
 > good catch!
 >
 >>
 >>
 >>>> give them *simple* 'programmatic' interfaces/paradigms to work with"
 >>>> or something like that, i think.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> [... food for endless discussions optimized...]
 >>
 >> To get back on topic:
 >>
 >> I agree I with that having $smarty.request is a bad thing. But I'm -1
 >> on removing it for the sake of backwards compatibility.
 >
 >
 > more than sane.
 >
 >>
 >> greetings
 >> messju
 >>
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |