|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 05/10/07 12:45
Jon Slaughter wrote:
> "Rami Elomaa" <rami.elomaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jYA0i.161597$y53.19889@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>> "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaughter@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Aun0i.1721$UU.300@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net...
>>> I was thinking about a way to use a similar idea but to dramatically
>>> increase the ability to thawrt bots.
>>>
>>> The idea is to use the idea that humans can use context and patterns to
>>> understand much better than computers in such cases as the following,
>>>
>>> http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2004/01/16/mipellssed_wdors.html
>>>
>>> So the idea is to ask the user a very simple questions that is written
>>> using misspelled words and such so that it makes it almost impossible for
>>> computers to recognize what the answer is. The question can be
>>> graphically manipulated so that its also visually harder to figure out
>>> like a normal captcha.
>>>
>>> Besides changing the order of the letters in a word one can deliberately
>>> change letters so that the word doesn't make sense but in the context is
>>> not difficult for a human. One can even use bad grammar and a few other
>>> things to make it more difficult.
>>>
>>> I was thinking that one could create a very large database of such things
>>> in different languages that sites could use.
>>>
>>> What do you guys think?
>>
>> You're giving the finger to dyslexic people.
>>
>
> And? So you think they can read normal captchas too? if they are dyslexic
> then chances are they can actually read them easier because there is
> context... so you don't have to read letter for letter but just get the
> question.
>
> Dyslexia is an excuse for stupid people.
>
>
No, dyslexia is a real medical problem.
And you are stupid and bigoted. Go back to alt.arseholes where you belong.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|